Chapter two discusses why groupwork should be implemented. The chapter notes how beneficial groupwork is for english language learners, and also that it is an excellent technique for conceptual learning, problem solving, and communication. In a typical classroom lesson, students will write a response to the teacher at some point, such as an essay or quiz, turn the assessment in, and then wait several weeks before getting a response or grade. That means it could be weeks before a students knows if they understand a lesson or not. When groupwork is implemented, students are much more likely to discuss concepts with each other and quickly realize if they have a clear understanding of the lesson. Based on my observation of students involved in groups, as long as students are vocal, they seem to self-correct one another.
Chapter three discusses possible problems with groupwork, mainly that classrooms consist of a student-hierarchy that can greatly effect a groups interaction. The most vocal member of a group is usually seen as the strongest member, while the quietest student is viewed as the weakest link. Heterogeneous groupings can help mediate groups creating these high and low ranking status members. I have certainly been a member of many groups where the loudest member becomes the leader, even though other members may have better ideas. Also, in middle and high school it often appears that the group member perceived to be the most popular becomes the leader.
Get off me donkey.
ReplyDelete